.
Feedback

The Home Guru: "Did Anybody Die in This House?"

The situation of "stigmatized" houses can produce unusual questions...and answers.

“Has anyone ever died in this house?” was the first question I was asked by one realtor whose clients had viewed one of my listings and liked it. Within the same week, a prospective buyer refused to enter a house because it was diagonally across the street from an 18th century cemetery, even though she had liked the listing tremendously online.

Such questions and concerns fall under the category in real estate of stigmatized properties that, by loose definition, can be the site of a murder or suicide, criminal activity or even a resident ghost.

I don’t know why I was initially surprised by these situations, considering my own case history. My wife and I purchased our first home from a friend in Brooklyn Heights. Our upstairs tenants were a wonderful, cultivated couple, both artists, he a designer for the New York Times and she, a filmmaker. Her official introduction to me the day we moved in was to ask whether the former owner told us that the house was haunted. I simply laughed. Within a short time, I was not laughing about the matter, with clear evidence that paranormal activity was taking place on the premises (but that’s gristle for another story, not necessarily involved with real estate).

While there is great debate about how a stigma can decrease a property’s value, actually, this one helped us. We had opened an antiques shop on the first floor of the house, and The New York Times favored us with a half-page story about a daring young couple who rustled up their deferred down payment for the house by selling off their collection of antiques in the shop and, by the way, the house was reputedly haunted.  The next day, people were lined up to get into our little shop, perhaps due in part to the reported stigma.

About 30 states across the country, including New York, have specific laws stating that sellers and their real estate agents cannot be held liable for not disclosing such nonmaterial or nonphysical defects about a house. This scenario was tested some years ago in a notorious case where a Poughkeepsie homeowner had committed a series of murders and buried the bodies in his basement. The subsequent buyer of the house attempted to sue the realtor for not being informed of this.

Disclosing information about a stigmatized house depends on many factors, mostly on state laws and circumstances surrounding the perceived stigmatization.  Sellers and real estate agents in New York and other states are not required to disclose deaths or hauntings, although most will do so if the prospective buyer asks. However, Connecticut's "Ghostbusters law" requires agents to inform buyers in writing of homicides, suicides, and other felonies if requested to do so by the buyer.

As far as actual physical defects are concerned, in 2002, New York State enacted the Property Condition Disclosure Act that requires sellers to inform buyers of known conditions of the property before the contract is signed. However, there is an option, which most lawyers recommend, that the seller decline submitting the form, but instead transfer $500 to the buyer at the time of closing.

While disclosure laws cover a lot of territory, from legal considerations, agents in most states notify buyers that they must do their own research about such matters as the quality of the local school system or if there are registered sex offenders in the neighborhood.

Effects of so-called stigmatization have varied among subsequent homeowners. The house in which the Charles Manson murders took place in 1969 had a successful sales history after the fact. The house had been rented from a landlord who moved back in just three weeks after the murders and lived there happily for the next 20 years. When the house was offered for sale after that period, it sold in two weeks.

However, according to appraisers who specialize in such homes, highly stigmatizing events can cut as much as 15 percent to 25 percent from the price a home would otherwise fetch. The largest markdowns, they say, are associated with explosive cases that receive broad media attention, such as the “Amityville Horror” house, where the homebuyers claim to have experienced terrible paranormal phenomenon after moving in. Another case is the property at which Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were murdered. In that case, the house was on the market for two years after the murders and sold for $200,000 less than what Nicole had paid for it.

Because my home was built in 1734 when people were more likely to die at home, I suspect that there have been many kind, gentle folks who died peaceful deaths in this lovely place, with their families around them.

I plan to place my property on the market next month and if asked if anyone has ever died in the house, I can answer confidently that I don’t know for sure, but given its age and history, I suspect so.

Bill Primavera is a Westchester, NY-based realtor (bill@PrimaveraRealEstate.com who can be reached for questions about buying or selling a home directly at 914-522-2076.

Joan Jennings April 21, 2012 at 12:56 pm
If someone dying on a property stigmatizes it, then hospitals would be the most haunted places ever! Have you ever heard of someone refusing to go to a hospital because of their fear of ghosts?
Heron April 21, 2012 at 01:08 pm
I think that people who believe in ghosts say that ghosts are the result of violent deaths. When there has been a terrible murder ghosts are more likely to remain. Most hospital deaths are relatively peaceful. I would think that the World Trade Center site would be enormously haunted.
Chris April 22, 2012 at 07:54 pm
You make an excellent point Joan, I never even thought of that.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Yorktown-Somers Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Evan Bray June 19, 2013 at 01:42 pm
Mr. Lachterman, You wrote "When Councilmen Bianco, Paganelli and Patel decided that theRead More Winery did not have the right to have a public hearing on their wetlands permit, they drew a line in the sand between personal interests and all business, large or small, in Yorktown." The wetland permit was NOT for the Winery. It was town land that we--the taxpayers--own. It's not "their" permit. Do you think that we should give away--for free--any town park/wetland to any business that asks. I'm not against working out an agreement whereby we charge the winery to develop parking and an outdoor cafe seating area on our (Yorktown owned) land. But you can bet your bottom dollar that I would want to codify it with a lease and charge him market rate for it. Capitalism, not communism. Those councilman made the right choice. It looked and smelled like a giveaway to a political ally of the supervisor. The winery had no inherent right to a public hearing on what we, the taxpayer, do with our land.
Jarid proudly displaying his graduation diploma and "Altruistic Act of the Year" Award
Carolyn DePaolo June 18, 2013 at 08:20 pm
Jarid is an exceptionally giving person. We are so very proud of him, today and every day. WeRead More certainly can all learn a life lesson from Jarid. Love you and we are so proud of you Jarid!
Yorktown Boy for 60yrs June 19, 2013 at 12:00 pm
Reading this made my day, it gives you hope that there are more people like Jarid in this World! IRead More can see that Jarid will be a great contributor to Society and who ever can call Jarid ther frien through life will be very lucky!!!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:45 pm
Thanks for sharing this photo. We'd love to hear more from these groups; if you'd like to startRead More blogs on Patch, which archive your posts all together and give you a great landing page on the site, please email me at LisaB@Patch.com.
Joey Cirone June 11, 2013 at 01:45 pm
Correction: The Yorktown Leo's Club raised and is giving away $12,600 this year!!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 09:13 am
That is fantastic! These are really nice photos - terrific young leaders at work. If you'd like toRead More set the Leo's up with a blog, they can document their service through brief write ups or photos throughout the year. Email me LisaB@Patch.com if you are interested.