.
Feedback

The Budget Sausage Making Process

2013 budget kicks can down the road for 2014 by relying on one-shot savings, one-time revenues, overly optimistic revenue projections and fund balance to offset a $1.1 million increase in expenses.

The Budget Sausage Making Process

Some people believe that taxpayers should be kept in the dark about the budget sausage making process.  I disagree.  I believe taxpayers should understand the process, warts and all.  More importantly, I believe taxpayers should know how the 2013 budget will impact their 2014 tax bill. It’s called being open, transparent -- and honest.

The good news, for 2013, is that when the basic town tax is combined with special district taxes, some taxpayers will see their total town tax bill go down; others will see an increase.  It all depends on which special districts you’re in.

The bad news is what the 2013 budget means for your 2014 taxes.

There are two ways to hold the line on taxes: cut expenditures or increase revenue.  Revenue can be increased either by finding new sources of revenue or simply inflating existing revenue projections.

The 2013 general fund budget includes an additional $1.4 million for increased salaries and benefits – and this expense will increase again next year because of existing labor contracts and likely increases in health benefits and pension payments, two expenses over which the Town has no control -- except to the extent that these costs are determined by the number of employees. 

But at a time when other towns are holding the line on creating new positions, not filling vacant positions or, as a last resort, laying off staff in order to hold the line of tax increases, Yorktown’s Preliminary Budget has a net increase in staff -- over and above staff increases already approved this year.

The only significant staff reduction in the 2013 budget is the elimination of one position in the Finance Department and that’s based on the assumption that the current deputy comptroller will be appointed comptroller and that the vacancy created by the resignation of the previous comptroller will not be backfilled. Of course, that savings assumes that the Town will no longer need  the services of the $9,000/month financial advisor the Board hired in October to assist the deputy comptroller. (The budget also includes $35,000 for a retired assessor to assist the current assessor.)

Instead of looking at how to reduce costs, the 2013 budget inflates revenue projections, uses overly optimistic one-shot revenue projections and one-shot savings, and large fund balance transfers to offset increased expenditures.  But what happens in 2014 when there may not be new one-shot revenues or savings to offset the increase in the Town’s employee costs and other expenses?

The 2013 budget also relies on additional revenue from the water, sewer and refuse special districts to cover expenses, in effect, robbing Peter, the special districts, to pay Paul, the general fund.

If you plan to be a Yorktown taxpayer in 2014, you may want to attend the public hearing on the budget on December 5. It’s your money the Town Board is spending.

For more information about the budget, visit yorktownbettergovernment.org

The following comments represent my personal view and are separate and distinct from my unbiased Patch blog postings of meeting summaries for Citizens for an Informed Yorktown, ciyinfo.org.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Yorktown-Somers Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
smellyp@nts May 22, 2013 at 05:34 pm
"what's not broken." AOL has said loud and clear Patch ain't profitable yet. but it ain'tRead More broken because you and one other commenter liked the old graphic design! oowee! LMAO!!
deena May 21, 2013 at 12:30 pm
I don't like the new layout either. I can't find anything, and most of the "comments"Read More have been deleted.
Mel May 21, 2013 at 10:14 am
I agree. Yet another case of don't fix what's not broken...
kmr303 May 18, 2013 at 11:38 am
First of all, I don't understand why teachers are paying for anything out of pocket when the supplyRead More lists that parents receive at the end of the summer are as long as their arms. Secondly, SOCIETY lets the kids down?!?!? I think the school taxes in Yorktown should be sufficient so that the teachers don't have to pay any out-of-pocket expenses. SOCIETY does not let the kids down, it is those who are in control of the school tax monies who let the kids down. Perhaps the administrators should take salary cuts, or maybe we should even eliminate some of those administrative positions. No teacher should have to pay for supplies out of pocket.