.
Feedback

Is Grouping in Special Education Class Appropriate?

The appropriateness of functional grouping in special education classes is often not an easy question. This is especially true when there are disruptive students in the class.

Comments from the NEUROLOGIST, Madeleine Kitaj

An 11-year old male patient returned for a follow up visit. He is in special education and has dyslexia, processing problems and ADD. His mother told me that her son is in a class with students who apparently have serious emotional problems. His mom went to observe his class and she saw one child acting out when frustrated because he did not know an answer, another constantly pushing the stapler down, making noise, and a third seemingly quite aggressive towards his classmates all of which distracted her son who had attention problems.

One of the other parents told the mom that her child was classified as a child having a “serious emotional disturbance.” The mom told me that it was impossible for her son to learn in this environment. She said that he does not belong in this class as he has no behavioral problems and is easily distracted by them. She asked me if the school district was allowed to “mix and match” this way. I asked the attorney.

Comments from the ATTORNEY, Michael Kaufman

A typical legal answer: “It depends.”

The facts, as is often the case, can push this in either direction and there is more that needs to be known. Although the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) does not speak about functional grouping for special education students, the New York State Regulations do. The Regulations seek to group students in special education classes “by similarity of individual needs.”

More specifically, it is the similarity of the individual needs of the students according to: levels of academic or educational achievement and learning characteristics; levels of social development; levels of physical development; and the management needs of the students in the classroom.

Based on what the mother reported what stands out is the “management needs” of some of the other children in this class. The specialized instruction necessary for the child with processing problems and dyslexia and who has attention problems is likely going to be interfered with by the management needs of some of the other children in the class. In order for this grouping to be appropriate, it must be shown that these management needs “do not consistently detract from the opportunities of other students in the group to benefit from instruction.”

While it may be possible to break the class down into different groups depending upon their academic needs that is usually not the case with respect to their management needs.

The question has to be asked: What plans, and were they adequate, were in place to deal with disruptive conduct. Were they sufficient to allow the other children in the class, especially distractible ones, to receive educational benefit?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Yorktown-Somers Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
kmr303 May 18, 2013 at 11:38 am
First of all, I don't understand why teachers are paying for anything out of pocket when the supplyRead More lists that parents receive at the end of the summer are as long as their arms. Secondly, SOCIETY lets the kids down?!?!? I think the school taxes in Yorktown should be sufficient so that the teachers don't have to pay any out-of-pocket expenses. SOCIETY does not let the kids down, it is those who are in control of the school tax monies who let the kids down. Perhaps the administrators should take salary cuts, or maybe we should even eliminate some of those administrative positions. No teacher should have to pay for supplies out of pocket.